|
CONFLICT
OF INTEREST The
Middle East Studies Association grants a number of awards and it is very
important that conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts of interest
be avoided in the process of determining who should receive the awards. For the
dissertation award committees, the following guidelines should be adhered to: 1)
Persons who have served as a dissertation advisor or dissertation
committee member should not make evaluations of such dissertations for committee
consideration. 2)
Persons should also abstain from evaluation of a submitted dissertation
if they are a relative of, spouse of, or have a significant personal
relationship with the author of the dissertation. 3)
It is necessary for persons to abstain from evaluation of the
dissertation if they are from the author's institution. 4)
It is not appropriate for members of the
award committee, for their own personal purposes, to make specific use of or
publicize any confidential information which may have been learned through
service on the committee. It is also not appropriate for members of award
committees to utilize or present the results of scholarly research which they
may have learned through service on the committee without the necessary
attributions and permissions. This is, however, to be distinguished from the
entirely appropriate benefit obtained by committee members who become better
acquainted with the state of current scholarship in Middle Eastern Studies. For the
book award committee, the following guidelines should be adhered to: 1)
Persons knowing that a book of which they are the author will be
submitted for consideration should withdraw from the award committee. 2) Persons
who have served as the primary advisor or a dissertation committee member for a
dissertation which is being submitted, either in original or revised form, as a
book for the competition should withdraw from consideration of that particular
case. 3)
Persons should withdraw from the committee if they are a relative of,
spouse of, or have a significant personal relationship with the author of any
submitted book. 4) Persons who are from the same academic institution or corporation as the author of a submitted book should abstain from providing evaluations of that book as committee members. 5) It is not necessary for persons to withdraw from the committee or abstain from evaluating a book if they have undertaken a manuscript review for a publisher or have reviewed the book elsewhere, but a person who served as a series editor in which a submitted book has appeared should abstain from evaluating that book. 6) It
is not appropriate for members of award committees, for their own personal
purposes, to make specific use of or publicize any confidential information
which may have been learned through service on the committee.
It is also not appropriate for members of award committees to utilize or
present the results of scholarly research which they may have learned through
service on the committee without the necessary attributions and permissions.
This is, however, to be distinguished from the entirely appropriate
benefit obtained by committee members who become better acquainted with the
state of current scholarship in Middle Eastern Studies. *************** Approved
by MESA's Board of Directors, Fall 1992 Board Meeting. Amended
and approved by MESA’s Board of Directors, Fall 1999.
|