Back to MESA 2004

 

Laurie Brand
School of International Relations
University of Southern California
MESA President, 2004

“Scholarship in the Shadow of Empire”

Sunday, November 21
7:30pm
St. Patrick's Catholic Church
756 Mission Street

Biographical Sketch

Although my parents introduced my sister and me to traveling outside the US when I was still in elementary school, until college, my concern with things Middle Eastern was limited to what I would describe as a general Protestant interest in Bible stories.

I headed to Georgetown University in the fall of 1974 with a real love for languages and a desire to double-major in French and Russian. Shortly after my arrival, however, I was told that the pedagogic style used in the first year Russian class was akin to that of an Eastern bloc army boot camp, an approach which I was sure would not tap into my best academic abilities. So, it was a confused freshman who entered the office of her academic advisor, Pierre Maubrey, the director of the French program, in search of guidance regarding which second language to study. Coming from Cincinnati, a heavily German city, I thought perhaps German would be a wise choice, until he asked me if I was planning to spend the rest of my life there. I had to admit to not having thought that through, and in the conversation that followed, this native of Dijon who had served with the French army in North Africa made a case to me for Arabic. “Don’t ever forget your English,” he admonished me, “but if you can become good at Arabic, it will open many doors for you.”

So, I took his advice, and with a handful of other French majors, signed up for first year Arabic with Wallace Erwin. At the time, I had absolutely no idea what I was getting myself into. No idea of the stark difference between fusha and ‘ammiyyah, no idea of the vastly diverging dialects, and no idea that this was the beginning of what is now approaching a thirty-year love affair with this awe-inspiring language.

I was privileged to receive a fellowship to study Arabic in Cairo on CASA, that marvelous program run for so many years by Ernest McCarus, in the summer of 1977 and then again for a full year, 1978-79. Beyond their impact on my Arabic, these experiences in Egypt, my first trips to the region, engendered in me a deep interest in and willingness to open up to challenges of other parts of the Middle East. The 1978-79 year also introduced me to a number of terrific graduate students, several of whom were instrumental in teaching me to think differently about the region and about the nature of US involvement in it. This constituted the beginning of my political awakening, my first attempts to come to terms with the prejudices and misconceptions my mid-west American upbringing had implanted in me regarding the Arab world.

Subsequent trips to the region as part of my master’s and Ph.D. program led me from an interest in questions of economic and political development – my initial idea for a Ph.D. thesis had been to write on some aspect of the reconstruction in the Suez Canal area – to an interest in Palestinian communities in the Middle East and what became my second passion, inter-Arab politics. I owe J.C. Hurewitz, my thesis advisor at Columbia, a debt of gratitude for pushing me to take on a swath of Palestinian politics far broader than my initial interest in the Egypt-based Palestinian Students Union. As others before me have noted in their presidential biographies, working on Palestinians was long a recipe for post-graduate unemployment. However, I was fortunate to land safely, initially at the Institute for Palestine Studies, where I had the great privilege of working for more than four years with Walid Khalidi, Constantine Zurayk, and at times Edward Said (who had also sat on my dissertation committee).

In the fall of 1988, I interviewed at and was hired by the School of International Relations at the University of Southern California. The absence of a Middle East center at USC initially appeared to me as a drawback. However, with people who specialized in regions and theoretical issues far different from those I studied, my department’s political and intellectual pluralism has certainly enriched my work. It has also been a supportive environment for my academic and political activities. I am particularly grateful to the USC College and university administration for standing their ground against attempts to put an end to my anti-war activism during my sabbatical in spring 2003.

I could not have known sitting in that Georgetown French department office in fall 1974 what a momentous decision choosing to study Arabic would be for me. As others in this field have learned, engaging in Middle Eastern studies in the United States means often finding one’s self at best frustrated, and at worst furious, with the political and intellectual climate in which we work. Given the current situation in the region, especially, but far from exclusively, in Iraq and Palestine/Israel, and the US’s role in these conflicts, I cannot remember when I have been more continuously outraged. Yet, I also cannot imagine having chosen another career path, and I am grateful to all those, both here in the US and in the Middle East, who have guided me along the way. It has rarely been easy, but given the chance to do it all over again, I would not change a thing.

This page was last updated on 04/06/2006.