|
Questions submitted online:
Dr Shelton thanked
SAC and President Eva Gonzales for inviting him to be part of this
forum. He thanked all SAC members for what they do for the
university community. He welcomes all questions and opinions and
looks forward to getting to know staff better in the years to come.
He is a native Arizonan who is glad to come home. While he doesn’t
know everything about the university he calls upon the best of the
best at the university to help him find the answers.
Q: Students and faculty have a representative on ABOR and staff
would like to have similar time with ABOR and wonder what your
feeling is on getting something similar for staff?
A: In my experience there has been a staff person with face time
with the governing board. It seems to me highly appropriate to have
something similar for staff but might be difficult to define since
there is so much variation that staff encompasses. I would like to
sit and talk with you on how this might come about. You are the most
numerous group who make sure things run well on campus and make a
career commitment much as faculty does so it makes good sense to me.
As you say, the three university staff councils have been meeting on
this already it would be good to see some joint proposal. In my
experience the chair from staff had a reserved time slot before the
finance and policy committee much as faculty for a sense of
parallelism and they would sit in on the meetings and were available
for questions from the board. If the councils could agree on some
proposal for how that would work I would be willing to take this to
the presidents and then on to the board.
* * * * *
Thank you for your decision to not move forward on the Rainbow
Bridge.
It just wasn’t feasible though it was a grand idea and maybe at
another time but at this point it just didn’t make sense.
* * * * *
I have had concerns that the last couple of pay raises have been
offset by additional cost in insurance and retirement withholdings.
I have been put in a higher tax bracket but wind up with less money
after the raise. Do you foresee a time when we will actually have a
raise we can keep without increasing everything else?
Also, research staff and others on soft money are left out on
raises until and if funds can be found.
Difficult to fix since only 25% of budgets are paid through state
funds. In NC the increase in parking and insurance was out distanced
by funds for raises. At this time the American public is not behind
education and their idea is that if you want an education why should
the American public pay for it. It is difficult to run educational
facilities with this outlook. We as voters need to make our feeling
known of the benefit to all society from higher education. Help us
to convey to our elected officials that what we do here is critical
to the future of the state. We have to turn around this cultural
belief wanting to cut taxes rather than pay for the benefit of us
all. We all want our children to have better than we have and
education is the way to make that happen. We have met with various
legislators and thanked them for the pay package but some of them
argue that we shouldn’t expect that in the future. We have to make a
change in their support for public education.
* * * * *
Parking seems to be an increasing problem on
campus. Are there plans for more garages, more zone 1 lots and will
the price for parking just keep going up. Seems wrong to be working
just to pay for parking on campus.
I think the answer to all those questions is yes
and since I knew the issue of parking would come up I actually got
some help on this. My understanding is that there are more parking
permits issued and more parking spots available now than ever in the
history of UA...doesn’t mean we are where we should be. There are
plans, a 2003 master plan to create more parking structures, more
parking garages where you can get more spaces on a limited plot of
land if you go up. The cost per space is about $1500 which where I
come from is dirt cheap. In chapel hill we were going to put an
underground facility that was to cost $20,000 per space so we killed
that project as it was impossible to do. The good news is it is
affordable to build more garages and it is in the master plan to do
so. We will be creating more surface lots in the interim before we
then go up with the garages. I asked the question about pricing is
costs about $900 per space to operate parking and about ½ of that
cost is covered by the cost of permits and the other half is paid
for by visitors. There is a good plan here for continued increase in
the number of parking places though I don’t know if it will ever
meet demand. Maybe you can tell me about some specific situations.
Could there be a way to differentiate student vs employee parking if
employees leave during the day they wont find parking later. There
is also problems with the size of spaces with vehicles getting
bigger...maybe compact car spaces. I will ask the folks who
understand the issues of parking. How about park and ride on
campus...Chapel Hill did a huge amount of this as the city limited
spaces...only about a 1/3 could get permits though the park and ride
permits were free. There was little alternative so it worked great
but we had zip cars for short unplanned trips for emergencies or
appts. In Phoenix
ASU gets free bus passes be
the UA Phx employees don’t have this same benefits. Employees using
their cars for work trips from off campus sites have real trouble
getting materials, etc on campus for work. Incentives for
alternative fuels, biking, bus passes, car pools, etc would be
appreciated. First thing I did in CH was to throw $500,000 at buses
and made it absolutely free but they are a smaller community. In
Durham they were larger but it cost and prices grew which made less
riders.
Carpool
designation is for 3 or more...is there a reason for this?
I will
look into that.
* * * * *
What is being done to improve supervisors on
campus...there seem to be a lot of them who are unqualified to hold
that position and others who tend to supervise employees according
to how much they suck up. I would like to see some sort of way for
employees to review supervisors.
Appreciate your wording of the question and they
are an important group on campus. I would be stunned if there wasn’t
some kind of training for these important positions. I will check
with HR. It is often assumed you know how to supervise with no
training and a minimal flexibility on utilizing your resources
compared to your responsibility. I would look in to the training
broadly to all supervisors since they can set the tone in these
units and make your life really good or really problematic. I know
we have an extensive ombudsman office for registering problems and
concerns and I hope that is working well and I realize that your
thought of making this training mandatory is preventing us from
getting to this stage.
* * * * *
The roads on campus have gotten really bad...pot
holes, rough pavement, etc. Is anything being done to improve the
situation?
I do know that we have responsibility for most of
the roads within our campus boundary and also know that there is a
lot torn up due to construction. Damage to cars due to potholes was
the concern. I know there was recent paving but I will bring this up
to Joel Valdez’ attention and am sure money permitting. They are
systematic about the process but I will mention this and I have also
heard this about bicycle routes and the safety involved.
* * * * *
There seems to be problems with bosses allowing
employees to volunteer for committees and councils or educate
themselves on campus. Is there anyway to improve support?
We have to work hand in glove with supervisors but
given policies that we have encouraging staff participation in
governance I think that supervisors should be encouraged to make
that happen. Any good policy can be abused and we aren't talking
about the abuse but we need you as part of the governance, we need
your ideas and we need you to represent what is going on so that if
mistakes are being made we get the corrected as soon as possible and
the only way we can do that is if you have time from your supervisor
that is not charged to vacation or compensatory leave so I support
that completely and work well with the supervisor to make that
happen. You have to tell me or Allison Vaillancourt in HR when that
is repeatedly not happening. Do you see it widespread or is it
nucleated in areas...we are having trouble with it on the council
where supervisors are not supporting attendance as fellow workers
may complain about council members are out of the office. You are
the best emissaries in getting fellow staff members to understand
what the council is doing for them so be sure to communicate that
with your fellow staff members and departments.
* * * * *
Will the UA ever consider a summer closure similar
to the one that takes place during the winter?
Well see I have just found out we have a closure
in the winter that is why you have to get out ...cant hang out in
your office. Not the research office, right? Its not good to say
never but I would find it highly unlikely as there isn’t an obvious
period and universities have been encouraged to utilize their
physical plant in the summer and so they are active for summer
school, sports and academic camps and the research that goes on. I
doubt that we would have a mandated summer closure. You might get
employees up in arms by forcing them to take their vacation at a
time that might not be convenient with the families, etc.
How about doing a 4 day week
I certainly think universities should be leading
the way in flexibility in working hours and that said there is a
need to have someone there and it depends on supervisors again but I
think within our ability to deliver our product flexible hours are
important. I would hope we would be able to make that kind of
scheduling available university wide...while not getting in the way
of the supervisor doing their job.
* * * * *
UA could increase its efficiency to save money and
the environment, but currently there is little incentive for, and
little empowerment of, individuals or departments wishing to
conserve resources managed by the University as a whole.
UA contains a large number of engineers and scientists who are not
called upon to serve the interests of the University, interests
which could benefit them as well. For example, soliciting the State
to help fund research which leads directly to lowered operating
costs would benefit both the taxpayer and the researcher -- a
powerful enticement.
What are your plans for improving the efficiency and empowering the
creativity of the University? In particular a computer that will
save money in power usage is not encouraged due to the initial cost
to purchase such a unit.
Incentives are very powerful in this world and I
think our society in America maybe more than any other has responded
by taking altruism and putting it into practice. Philanthropy in
this country is unheard of in any other part of the world. Just
because we are supposed to be good but we respond to incentives and
we should have programs in place that reward that. One of the things
about out labs...once I got my grants I didn’t have to pay for my
utilities it is all supposedly included in my grants through
indirect costs though the grant doesn’t come near to covering these
true indirect costs. They are supposedly covered by state operating
and maintenance of plant funds when in fact we are all in fact
bootstrapping our way and anything we can do on a large or small
scale to be more efficient is very worthwhile.
* * * * *
How do you expect to utilize Staff Advisory
Council to help make your Presidential Decisions and Policy's
effecting University of Arizona Staff Employees.
We received a memo stating you had contacted
faculty, staff, etc but SAC had not been contacted. I talked with
folks in Spebac and deans council but clearly missed SAC and I
apologize having missed you on this time constraint issue of budgets
which were due in July. We will try and keep in touch now that I
know the correct contact and we will try to get President Shelton
here at least 3 times a year.
* * * * *
Do you plan on making correspondence courses
available to employees through Qualified Tuition Reduction?
I'm writing this down...employees working during
the day or at our outlying areas. I will look into that. NAU has
cornered the market as part of their regents approved mission so we
wouldn’t have as extensive an offering. If you are a staff member at
the UA it seems to me if you are taking a class at the UA that we
ought to offer the same kind of tuition benefit no matter how the
class offered. Now I may run into all kinds of bureaucratic hurdles
but doesn’t that sound logical. We are in the business of education
and we so should be encouraging our employees in continuing
education and if we can do that and make it a benefit of employment
it seems like a good way to keep good people.
* * * * *
Do you plan to address the growing abyss between
Faculty and Classified Staff? How about the divide between
Administration and Classified Staff? Are you aware of the continual
politics played throughout the university and how it plays a role in
holding the growth and success of the campus back?
No one person can make all this happen by his or
herself... if I don’t have all of you working with me I'm gonna
fail. Individual faculty members that has a large research program
or a large teaching responsibility, the students...the smartest
thing I ever conveyed to my children as they were going to school
was they have to get to know the staff in your unit because they are
the ones that will make things happen. Make sure you understand
where they are coming from and when you need help make sure you
express those needs clearly and a timeline for when things can be
carried out. I know that the u has to have very good political
relationships with the communities in Tucson and I have already been
working on those to community meetings for if we are going to grow
as the state of population is to fulfill our mission. I don’t think
we have a 40,000 cap (300 freshmen/ 100 transfers per year) in
admissions but we are going to grow and continue the quality of the
education and programs we provide. We have to grow UA South and
support their programs and cooperative extensions in the state.
Politics is not a bad word it is just what happens with any
gathering like this forum trying to improve the UA and the people
committed and dedicated to the UA. My job is to get out and
understand the different communities around the UA, city, state. I
am ready to embrace the politics and so to be even better than we
already are.
* * * * *
How do you plan to address the issue of morale
regarding Classified Staff on campus?
I think the best think I can do is the same as any
leader and that is to be seen as a very public advocate on behalf of
our employees whether that is in Phoenix
or Tucson or here at
this forum. I'm not going to pretend that I can suddenly turn
everything around and when I walk up the
Phoenix the legislature
is going to say yeah sure take 20% pay raises to everyone, but I can
promise you is the single most important factor on this campus is
people. Making sure we reward those that work hard, that we provide
the best possible work environment. I feel very strongly that if we
take good care of people all the rest of the issue will follow and
that is the message I have been taking to the legislators, governor,
mayors, anyone that will listen to me and give me an audience. How
do we take care of good people is the key.
* * * * *
Added question posed by a staff member...
Almost our entire dept is off campus and as
president I wonder how you might encourage staff in those situations
to take part in the great campus activities to our work as campus
staff like attending lectures, and other things on campus beyond the
parking challenge.
Maybe set up a dept campus pass so a group of you
can come on campus and improves communication when you can attend
these kinds of meetings. Improve communications and it does come
back to parking. Service permits available for purchase with certain
spaces designated for these permits. The problem is that a lot of
these off campus dept are smaller entities and don’t have the money
to buy that permit. How do other universities handle this? U of MI
had wonderful shuttle systems for these outlying areas when there is
no parking on campus. Each university has a different issue and ways
of dealing with them. Has any thoughts been given to those traveling
to Phoenix
and light rail might be nice
but we might get some to carpool from point to point but most folks
need their vehicle to get around...in cities with poor intercity
transportation we are stuck needing the car to get to where you are
going. Zip cars are good so long as folks don’t monopolize the
vehicle all day and I will check into the feasibility of such
service here at UA. I am getting some real ideas to bring up to the
folks that know about these. Also service permits are being used by
so many departments now that facility management has problem
servicing building due to lack of available spaces. Flexibility of
hours can also help with some of these mid day appointments by
leaving earlier for the appt rather than try to plan to attend.
Some questions may not have been
covered as time was limited but we hope to have Dr Shelton repeat
this format yearly |